|
|
|
@ -115,15 +115,6 @@ keywords: |
|
|
|
|
- Interdisciplinary astronomy(804) |
|
|
|
|
software: "astropy \\citep{2013A&A...558A..33A,2018AJ....156..123A}, Cloudy \\citep{2013RMxAA..49..137F}, Source Extractor \\citep{1996A&AS..117..393B}" |
|
|
|
|
facilities: "HST(STIS), Swift(XRT and UVOT), AAVSO, CTIO:1.3m, CTIO:1.5m, CXO" |
|
|
|
|
acknowledgements: |
|
|
|
|
We thank all the people that have made this AASTeX what it is today. This |
|
|
|
|
includes but not limited to Bob Hanisch, Chris Biemesderfer, Lee Brotzman, |
|
|
|
|
Pierre Landau, Arthur Ogawa, Maxim Markevitch, Alexey Vikhlinin and Amy |
|
|
|
|
Hendrickson. Also special thanks to David Hogg and Daniel Foreman-Mackey |
|
|
|
|
for the new "modern" style design. Considerable help was provided via bug |
|
|
|
|
reports and hacks from numerous people including Patricio Cubillos, Alex |
|
|
|
|
Drlica-Wagner, Sean Lake, Michele Bannister, Peter Williams, and Jonathan |
|
|
|
|
Gagne. |
|
|
|
|
header-includes: | |
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{hologo} |
|
|
|
|
\usepackage{xspace} |
|
|
|
@ -1700,6 +1691,16 @@ not have specific bibtex entries for these types of references so the |
|
|
|
|
code the ``@misc`` type correctly. The most recent aasjournal.bst file, |
|
|
|
|
available with \aastex v6, will output bibtex ``@misc`` type properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:::{.acknowledgements} |
|
|
|
|
We thank all the people that have made this AASTeX what it is today. This |
|
|
|
|
includes but not limited to Bob Hanisch, Chris Biemesderfer, Lee Brotzman, |
|
|
|
|
Pierre Landau, Arthur Ogawa, Maxim Markevitch, Alexey Vikhlinin and Amy |
|
|
|
|
Hendrickson. Also special thanks to David Hogg and Daniel Foreman-Mackey |
|
|
|
|
for the new "modern" style design. Considerable help was provided via bug |
|
|
|
|
reports and hacks from numerous people including Patricio Cubillos, Alex |
|
|
|
|
Drlica-Wagner, Sean Lake, Michele Bannister, Peter Williams, and Jonathan |
|
|
|
|
Gagne. |
|
|
|
|
::: |
|
|
|
|
<!-- |
|
|
|
|
%% IMPORTANT! The old "\acknowledgment" command has be depreciated. It was |
|
|
|
|
%% not robust enough to handle our new dual anonymous review requirements and |
|
|
|
|